Hello Kevin, Thanks again, Kevin. I think I should try your solution, before RitLabs put back that feature.
TB! integrates with PGP fairly well. Does it work smoothly with GPG, too? Does GPGRelay support multiple accounts well? -- Best regards, Jack Thursday, October 7, 2004, 2:26:10 PM, you wrote: KC> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- KC> Hash: SHA1 KC> Hi Jack, KC> On Thu, 7 Oct 2004 13:01:26 -0700 (4:01 PM here), Jack [J] wrote in KC> <mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: J>> Thanks for the reply. I have more than one PGP accounts and I have J>> to deal with most of my emails this way. I have PGP installed and J>> everything works well except that I can not save decrypted J>> messages. PGPRelay seems to be a solution but it requires running a J>> separate process, some settings, and installing GPG. KC> You are correct in that GPGrelay requires GPG and runs as a relay. Its KC> been quite awhile since I converted from PGP to GPG and honestly, I KC> haven't missed PGP. KC> One thing I appreciate about GPGrelay is that both the mail in my Sent KC> folder and any inbound mail are decrypted. This makes text searches KC> possible, and eliminates the worry about keeping old expired or KC> revoked keys in my keyring. KC> Its also quite convenient having a GPG manager. No matter which mail KC> client I send from, recipients inlined or PGP/MIME preferences are KC> respected. I don't have to think about it. J>> I do prefer that TB will add back the feature they took out in V3. J>> With 1.6x version, I can do that but some of the folders created in J>> 2.x can not be seen. KC> I never understood why RIT removed this feature. While I can KC> appreciate that some people need to keep things encrypted, many of us KC> have our own method of securing the data. Not giving the client a KC> choice didn't seem prudent. In my case, it drove me to seek a 3rd KC> party solution. ________________________________________________ Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
