Hello Marck.

--On 19 May 2005 11:57 +0100 you wrote about Re: Proposal for spam filters:


> No Marck - it was Tony's mistake.

Yes, sorry my mistake.

> But I can't find where they define their whitelisting stuff.

How odd, you gave the impression you used it all the time for allowing
certain addresses through that were wrongly classified as spam? Isn't that
why you wanted a [TAG] in the subject line, to make it easier for you to
enter those addresses into your spamcop whitelist?

> So I'm backing down from this convo.

Not my mistake after all then :)

-- 

Tony.

M.

Attachment: pgpc2vAgzilFO.pgp
Description: PGP signature

________________________________________________
Current version is 3.5 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Reply via email to