Hello Group

On Wednesday, June 22, 2005, 7:06:46 AM, Allister wrote:

> Personally, I've never understood the fascination Windows software has
> with the Registry.  What on earth is wrong with properties files? If
> you give the user a choice where to store them, then proper backups are
> a breeze and multi-user setups are simple.


You'll be glad to hear that Microsoft has come round to this way of
thinking, to some extent at least. They have been recommending for
some time that applications should keep configuration data in their
own configuration files, with the advent of .NET probably an XML file
rather than an INI file.

I expect that it will take some years for developers to catch up,
having learned how to use  the registry.

The key advantage, apart from avoiding registry bloat, is that apps
don't need to be 'installed' if they don't use the registry, you can
just copy them to your HD. 80% of my most used apps don't use the
registry. They are on my 'D' drive and, after a periodic re-install of
XP, they work immediately.


-- 
Jeff Gaines Damerham Hampshire UK
:Jeff_Gaines:



________________________________________________
Current version is 3.5.25 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Reply via email to