Hello wonderful Roelof Otten, den 30 september 2005, 00:59:17, du skrev:
RO> Hallo qe3ee, RO> On Fri, 30 Sep 2005 00:35:25 +0200GMT (30-9-2005, 0:35 +0200, where I RO> live), you wrote: Q>> I'm short in english slang here: Q>> What do you mean by "offending message" to the tbbeta list? The word shows up Q>> as "insult" on Merriam-Webster: RO> An offending message would be a message that does something bad, RO> breaks a law or whatever. In this case that would be a message that RO> refuses to be viewed. RO> (An insulting message would be offensive) RO> The idea was to send one of these messages that don't show via MIME RO> forwarding to the tbbeta list. RO> I don't know whether you're subscribed to the tbbeta list, but as you RO> were talking about a failing in a beta version I'm supposed to point RO> to tbbeta, as betas are off topic here on tbudl. (If I don't point to RO> tbbeta, Marck and Leif will take my moderator license away <g>) RO> However, now you're mentioning the same same behaviour in 3.51.10 and RO> if I'm not mistaken that was a regular release. Thank you for the language lesson and yes the the bat 3.51.10 is a regulare version. The behavior doesn't make sence. The messagesource "looks" similare in both messages when viewed inside the bat as well outside. Do you have some knowleage to share in how to find the messages inside a tbb with a program like WinHex? They show up as absolutely identical i sourceviewer. -- kind regards, qe3ee --------------------------------------------------------------- E fructu arbor cognoscitur --------------------------------------------------------------- if this mail has a virus please throw it away and notify me :) ________________________________________________ Current version is 3.60.7 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
