Hallo Tom, On Fri, 23 Dec 2005 19:22:00 -0800GMT (24-12-2005, 4:22 +0100, where I live), you wrote:
TP> I've said it before and I'll say it again. TP> http://www.0spam.com TP> It's the only spam solution you will ever need. That's a bit of unfriendly system, isn't it? After all it requires people to reply to a message that asks for confirmation before it passes your message to the intended recipient. Bit of a hassle when you forget to include all of your mailing lists. Yes, that happens, at least twice somebody forgot to include the tb-lists into their 0spam setup. On this side of the filter that's more than a nuisance. Apart from the fact that the requests for verification are easily caught in somebody's spam filter, due to their automated nature. And finally for the business people among us. Customers who send a message and have to confirm their address before you're reading it are prone to go elsewhere. I'm not saying it won't work, but it's definitely not something I'd recommend. -- Groetjes, Roelof Blessed are the pessimistic, for they hath made backups. The Bat! 3.64.01 Christmas Edition Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 1 pop3 account, server on LAN OTFE enabled P4 3GHz 2 GB RAM
pgp8kRU9drZzY.pgp
Description: PGP signature
________________________________________________ Current version is 3.62.14 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
