Hello Tom Plunket & everyone else, on 24-Dez-2005 at 10:36 you (Tom Plunket) wrote:
> 0spam.com only requires that you tell it what your mailing lists are, the > rest is automatic if you so desire. Just fwiw. The fact is that the > fastest way to deal with spam is to simply not download it in the first > place. Also the fact that you don't need to run any software on your > computer whatsoever, and, well, yeah. I understand the concept but I don't feel comfortable when yet another party enters my email conversations. >> No false positives for 190 days. > Is K9 configured to only distinguish between "spam" and "not spam"? Yes. > To me that was one of the beauties of PopFile when I started using it > 3+ years ago. Same here, but PopFile is so awkwardly slow and consumes a sh*tload of system resources. I could do my PF classifications with TBs filters just as well. -- Best regards, Alexander (http://www.neurowerx.de - ICQ 238153981) I don't believe in God, because I don't believe in Mother Goose. -- Clarence Darrow ________________________________________________ Current version is 3.62.14 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
