Hi Thomas,
Tuesday, January 30, 2007, 7:55:28 PM, you wrote:
TF> That's so inconvenient. Why go through all the trouble and create a
TF> tinyurl in the first place, if it is much more convenient for the
TF> sender and the receiver to just c&p the full URL into the mail?
Excessively long URLs "break" due to word wrap for users of Outlook
or Outlook Express, and even those of them sophisticated enough to
understand why the link doesn't work must go to the trouble to paste
it together again to follow the link. So in such cases it is not more
convenient to just c&p the full URL into the mail.
That's not a problem for those of us who use The Bat!, of course, but
not everybody uses The Bat!
I understand that you don't use it or want to use it. That is your
prerogative. As I said in my first message, I am not trying to change
your opinion or behavior.
--
Regards,
Perry
Using The Bat! v3.95.8 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2
________________________________________________
Current version is 3.95.08 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
