Hello Jim, On Tue, 19 Feb 2008 22:36:10 -0600 GMT (20/02/2008, 11:36 +0700 GMT), Jim Kyle wrote:
JK> Check your templates. Your example definitely appears to have the JK> quoted material following the signature, where the old default JK> templates put it at the top of the reply. Looks to me as if the JK> new version may have changed all the templates! If not that, then JK> the program is not processing the template properly now. No, the templates are still processed correctly and have not been changed. What Tim did was put the %Quotes macro under the signature. This didn't change the font in the old plaintext viewer, but does in the new viewer paradigm. He can still set the signature text to the same font as the main text, but better (on the TB lists) is to follow the rules and not top-post. JK> This thread and a few others has solidified my decision to remain JK> with version 3.85. It ain't broke (for me) so I see no need to fix JK> it (and lots of reason NOT to)... I actually like the new Viewer Profiles. They are easy to set up, and once you've done that, you can switch on the fly. Rather than having only two setting for fonts as previously (plaintext and HTML), we can now set as many as we like. Setting up a new profile is as easy as in the HTML (richtext) viewer previously. What other reasons do you see not to upgrade? I mean, if you are happy with 3.85, that's fine. But you say there are reasons not to upgrade, so I am curious. -- Cheers, Thomas. Eine Ratte schwaermt der anderen vor: 'Ach ja, diese Lerngesetze sind schon toll! Jedes Mal wenn ich diesen Hebel druecke, muss mir der Weisskittel Futter geben!' http://thomas.fernandez.hat-gar-keine-homepage.de/ Message reply created with The Bat! 4.0.14.2 under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 ________________________________________________ Current version is 4.0.14.0 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
