Guten Morgen,

MJS> Let me bite on this one!

You're very welcome. <g>


MJS> Now I really hope someone in the list can confirm or otherwise that
MJS> RITLAbs is working on full IMAP support for v4.1

There are mails from the beta-list where RIT promises just that. Like
they did for v4.0. And 3.5. And 3.0, if I remember corretly. I haven't
been around for IMAP any earlier, so I can't speak to what happened
then.

They mentioned that they would have to redesign the message base
format to properly support IMAP and that they would tackle this in
v4.1 (which at this time is intended to be a non-free update, by the
way.)


MJS> because I have a lot of trouble understanding "but generally it
MJS> works", when it clearly does NOT! It's like being a little bit
MJS> pregnant, either you are or you aren't.

That's funny - this is what came to my mind word by word. I absolutely
agree: To be used in any serious environment IMAP doesn't have to work
at just one time, it has to work _every_ time. Even "most of the time"
would hardly be enough, since this still can mean the difference
between closing that deal in time or loosing money on it big time
because you literally never got the message.


MJS> I will go so far as to say it will be difficult for TB to retain the
MJS> crown as a credible alternative in the corporate arena without IMAP 
support.

The way I see it this crown has been passed on quite some time ago.
There was a time when email was POP3 and TheBat hat the works for
corporate grade. Today, corporate email is either Exchange or IMAP.
TheBat/Exchange is incomplete (no calendar management so our corporate
client will use Outlook anyway) and TheBat/IMAP is unreliable. It
might as well not exist.


MJS> Frankly none of RITLAbs answers satisfies me, so maybe we can
MJS> shame someone there into giving us hope this matter will be
MJS> resolved soon.

I tried that, belive me. It seems the problem is that only one or two
guys from RIT even understand english, so you can throw anything at
them without any effect. Again, I've walked that road.


-- 
MfG,
 Alto                            mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Attachment: pgpQameprN8KJ.pgp
Description: PGP signature

________________________________________________
Current version is 4.0.18 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Reply via email to