Hi On Wednesday 10 September 2008 at 6:49:40 PM, in <mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Bob Riley wrote:
> I was thinking of conserving bandwidth in the whole system. I think > of IMAP as very handy (convenient) but perhaps using much more > bandwidth than POP. Am I mistaken? Logic would suggest that IMAP (and webmail, for that matter) must use more bandwidth than POP, assuming you ever view messages more than once. -- Best regards, MFPA Experience is the name everyone gives to their mistakes Using The Bat! v4.0.28.3 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 ________________________________________________ Current version is 4.0.24.0 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
