Hello Marck, On Wed, 15 Apr 2009 17:01:54 +0100 GMT (15/Apr/09, 23:01 +0700 GMT), Marck D Pearlstone wrote:
TF>> Why so complicated? MDP> Because I am a power crazed technophile with a penchant for full MDP> automation. At least you're honest. ;-) MDP> The QT's are the same ones I use for standard replies. I didn't write MDP> them specially for the job, they were already there. I just copied my MDP> standard reply template and shifted a couple of things around. I do MDP> have a second version of tr called trl. That is my "Love from" MDP> template, which gives only my first name in the from and is much more MDP> casual. I think it also includes the cookified attribution mechanism MDP> we've been chatting about privately. MDP> ... <snip> I see. I have different templates for different accounts but your templates make sense if you use only one. TF>> In my business accounts, the templates are all set up for TF>> top-posting, with the full sig before the attribution line even TF>> starts. MDP> ... and my tr QT performs that job for me, whichever account I am MDP> using. Besides, I pretty much have 1 email address that I use for MDP> everything. I've had this address for 14 years now, so it's not so MDP> easy for me to separate business and personal mail. Also, I have to MDP> decide on the fly who gets a top-posted reply and whose is in-line. Right, that is the big difference between our two set-ups. MDP> Horses for courses, as they say. Make mine a horses doovre (hors MDP> d'oevres - geddit? [groan]). Let me confirm to you: [groan]. I'm glad you're a musician on stage and not a comedian. ;-) -- Cheers, Thomas. http://thomas.fernandez.hat-gar-keine-homepage.de/ Message reply created with The Bat! 4.1.11 under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 3 ________________________________________________ Current version is 4.1.11 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
