StandaloneClusteringProvider isn't an interface :-) It's a concrete implementation of the ClusteringProvider interface for direct express usage of the toolkit, hence why I suggested the ExpressToolkit name.
On 19 May 2010, at 20:35, Sergio Bossa wrote: >> Well, it is specifically for express usage, not for custom usage. > > Good point. > But I just meant that interfaces should be named after their context > and intent: "Express" (but also "Toolkit" indeed) doesn't reveal that > much, while IMHO "Cluster" and/or "Terracotta" are more context > revealing and meaningful. -- Geert Bevin Terracotta - http://www.terracotta.org _______________________________________________ tc-dev mailing list tc-dev@lists.terracotta.org http://lists.terracotta.org/mailman/listinfo/tc-dev
