I sort of have but then again I'm the one that selected Clustering ;-)
In my reasoning it's a toolkit to provider clustering functionalities to
developers, it's not a toolkit for the cluster as an architecture. Hence why I
personally find ClusteringToolkit better sounding than ClusterToolkit.
On 21 May 2010, at 13:45, Abhishek Sanoujam wrote:
> Was just fixing up already existing tests to use the new name. Thinking about
> it, I guess ClusterToolkit sounds a bit better, at least to me, than
> ClusteringToolkit.
> See snippet below:
> ClusteringToolkit getClusteringToolkit() {
> return new ExpressToolkit(terracottaUrl);
> }
> v/s
> ClusterToolkit getClusterToolkit() {
> return new ExpressToolkit(terracottaUrl);
> }
>
> When using the api, i think i like "ClusterToolkit getClusterToolkit()" more.
> Anyone have any strong feelings ?
--
Geert Bevin
Terracotta - http://www.terracotta.org
_______________________________________________
tc-dev mailing list
tc-dev@lists.terracotta.org
http://lists.terracotta.org/mailman/listinfo/tc-dev
