I kinda lean toward cluster over clustering. Hears why.
Clustering is one of the things that happens in a cluster.
The ClusterToolkit does things like distributed locking, moving data around,
notification of things
happening in the cluster. Plus I think I like that ClusterToolkit is a Noun vs.
ClusteringToolkit which
feels more like a verb. Of course there are many debates out there as to
whether the class as a noun
thing is even a good idea.
Not militant about it or anything but that's just what's running through my
head right now.
On May 21, 2010, at 7:50 AM, Geert Bevin wrote:
> I sort of have but then again I'm the one that selected Clustering ;-)
>
> In my reasoning it's a toolkit to provider clustering functionalities to
> developers, it's not a toolkit for the cluster as an architecture. Hence why
> I personally find ClusteringToolkit better sounding than ClusterToolkit.
>
> On 21 May 2010, at 13:45, Abhishek Sanoujam wrote:
>
>> Was just fixing up already existing tests to use the new name. Thinking
>> about it, I guess ClusterToolkit sounds a bit better, at least to me, than
>> ClusteringToolkit.
>> See snippet below:
>> ClusteringToolkit getClusteringToolkit() {
>> return new ExpressToolkit(terracottaUrl);
>> }
>> v/s
>> ClusterToolkit getClusterToolkit() {
>> return new ExpressToolkit(terracottaUrl);
>> }
>>
>> When using the api, i think i like "ClusterToolkit getClusterToolkit()" more.
>> Anyone have any strong feelings ?
>
> --
> Geert Bevin
> Terracotta - http://www.terracotta.org
>
> _______________________________________________
> tc-dev mailing list
> tc-dev@lists.terracotta.org
> http://lists.terracotta.org/mailman/listinfo/tc-dev
_______________________________________________
tc-dev mailing list
tc-dev@lists.terracotta.org
http://lists.terracotta.org/mailman/listinfo/tc-dev
