For distribution purposes for sure concurrency == 1 is fine when there is a single active L1 in your cluster. You still might potentially see some more throughput with slightly higher concurrency levels with something > 1 though.
I'm pretty sure there is a task to look into whether the current default (2048) is a good choice since it does have some downsides at the moment (in particular I think initial faulting is slower because of this). -----Original Message----- From: Sergio Bossa [mailto:sergio.bo...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2011 3:26 PM To: Tim Eck Cc: tc-dev@lists.terracotta.org Subject: Re: [tc-dev] Purpose of concurrency level in ConcurrentDistributed(Server)Map On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 12:19 AM, Tim Eck <t...@terracottatech.com> wrote: > This detail is probably not > nearly as important as the first reason which has to do with distribution > in a array of terracotta servers. Okay, so if I have a single active L1, I could safely set the concurrency level to 1 ... right? -- Sergio Bossa http://www.linkedin.com/in/sergiob _______________________________________________ tc-dev mailing list tc-dev@lists.terracotta.org http://lists.terracotta.org/mailman/listinfo/tc-dev
