On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 12:34 AM, Tim Eck <t...@terracottatech.com> wrote:
> For distribution purposes for sure concurrency == 1 is fine when there is > a single active L1 in your cluster. You still might potentially see some > more throughput with slightly higher concurrency levels with something > 1 > though. Great, thanks. > I'm pretty sure there is a task to look into whether the current default > (2048) is a good choice since it does have some downsides at the moment > (in particular I think initial faulting is slower because of this). Indeed, that was the reason I started looking at the source code: due to the 2048 maps, my application startup was very slow and ended up in OOM! Cheers, Sergio B. -- Sergio Bossa http://www.linkedin.com/in/sergiob _______________________________________________ tc-dev mailing list tc-dev@lists.terracotta.org http://lists.terracotta.org/mailman/listinfo/tc-dev
