On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 11:17 AM, Emmanuel Lochin <[email protected]>wrote:
> On 3 November 2011 09:45, Pars Mutaf <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Usman, > > > > The method you are suggesting means that we need to wait 6 months for > > feedback (3-5 reviews). > > Hi Pars, > > Why do you think it would be faster with your proposal? > I saw that you requested a review for one of your paper, but how long > you expect to get real reviews? I mean, not from your friends, > colleagues or collaborators. > Who is going to stand whether the reviewer is skilled or not? > If the reviewer is not anonymous, who would risk to send a review that > might be qualified as bad by the author or another person? > > I think you should clearly expose the rules of your system, I really > do not understand how does it work. > Hi Emmanuel, Normally you should come with answer not questions (it is not only my idea). I mean: Question the current system not the new one to come. http://www.gopetition.com/petitions/replacing-scientific-conferences-with-a-cheap-and-effic.html Pars > > Regards, > > Emmanuel > > > > Pars > > > > On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 10:08 AM, Usman Ashraf < > [email protected]>wrote: > > > >> Dear All, > >> > >> Is there a point that I'm missing? why don't we just submit our work to > a > >> reputed journal for feedback? > >> Most reputed journals don't charge anything, don't cost as much as > >> conferences and provide us with a decent feedback. > >> > >> regards > >> Usman. > >> > >> > Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2011 09:43:11 +0200 > >> > From: [email protected] > >> > To: [email protected] > >> > CC: [email protected] > >> > Subject: [Tccc] Requesting open feedback to my work (Re: Promoting > open > >> on-line research) > >> > >> > > >> > Hi all, > >> > > >> > Could you please send feedback for the following work. I don't want to > >> > submit it to conferences just for feedback. I would therefore need > your > >> > opinion: > >> > > >> > http://arxiv.org/abs/1103.5115 > >> > > >> > Or, please point me to me to a list working on this kind of topic. > >> > > >> > Pars > >> > > >> > PS: Based on the below idea, this is a test for open research. > >> > > >> > On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 5:20 PM, Joe Touch <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > On 11/1/2011 11:37 PM, Pars Mutaf wrote: > >> > > ... > >> > > > >> > > Conferences may have the benefits that are listed above. The > problem is > >> > >> being tied to conferences just for receiving feedback. > >> > >> > >> > > > >> > > It's useful to appreciate that it has always been possible to write > >> drafts > >> > > and tech reports and post them - either via direct email, or to > lists* > >> for > >> > > discussion or feedback. > >> > > > >> > > *This list in particular is intended for exactly this kind of > >> discussion; > >> > > we are often overrun with CFPs, but they is NOT the primary > motivation > >> for > >> > > this list.* > >> > > > >> > > Joe (TCCC Chair) > >> > > > >> > > *it's more useful to post only the abstract, not the full text or > PDF > >> FWIW. > >> > > > >> > > *there are many IEEE Comsoc TCs; it's always useful to post your > ideas > >> to > >> > > the TC most specific to your work. > >> > > > >> > _______________________________________________ > >> > IEEE Communications Society Tech. Committee on Computer Communications > >> > (TCCC) - for discussions on computer networking and communication. > >> > [email protected] > >> > https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/tccc > >> > > _______________________________________________ > > IEEE Communications Society Tech. Committee on Computer Communications > > (TCCC) - for discussions on computer networking and communication. > > [email protected] > > https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/tccc > > > > > > -- > "This email and any attachments are confidential. They may contain legally > privileged information or copyright material. You should not read, copy, > use > or disclose them without authorisation. If you are not an intended > recipient, please contact us at once by return email and then delete both > messages. We do not accept liability in connection with computer virus, > data corruption, delay, interruption, unauthorised access or unauthorised > amendment. This notice should not be removed" > _______________________________________________ IEEE Communications Society Tech. Committee on Computer Communications (TCCC) - for discussions on computer networking and communication. [email protected] https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/tccc
