On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 6:56 PM, Joe Touch <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On 11/3/2011 9:45 AM, Pars Mutaf wrote: > ... > >> >> First step is arxiv, second is infocom, third is ToN. >> >> Or perhaps, >> >> First step is arxiv, second step is ToN. >> >> >> Sure. >> >> Note that this doesn't require a petition, where this all started: >> http://www.gopetition.com/__**petitions/replacing-__** >> scientific-conferences-with-a-**__cheap-and-effic.html<http://www.gopetition.com/__petitions/replacing-__scientific-conferences-with-a-__cheap-and-effic.html> >> >> <http://www.gopetition.com/**petitions/replacing-** >> scientific-conferences-with-a-**cheap-and-effic.html<http://www.gopetition.com/petitions/replacing-scientific-conferences-with-a-cheap-and-effic.html> >> > >> >> Nothing is being *replaced*. >> >> In the words of Nike's advertising department, "Just do it.". >> >> >> I cannot do it. You can? >> >> Should we ask arxiv? >> > > I'm confused. Arxiv is already an open publications platform. What is > missing that you seek? > > If you're missing the review side, i.e., where people can sign up and > perform reviews, then you need to find, develop, and/or run the software > needed, or convince someone else to do so. > > Again, "just do it". > > There's nobody stopping you. > > There is also nobody paying you. But you do have all that money you'll be > saving not registering at conferences, and all that money you saved getting > reviews more quickly ;-) > > OK this is also an input. Always helpful.
Pars > Joe > _______________________________________________ IEEE Communications Society Tech. Committee on Computer Communications (TCCC) - for discussions on computer networking and communication. [email protected] https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/tccc
