On Feb 20, 2023, at 2:20 AM, Guy Harris <ghar...@sonic.net> wrote:

> So the code is correct, but could easily be misintrpreted.  Perhaps it'd be 
> better if we used the values from af.h rather than using AF_INET and 
> AF_INET6.  

Done in 0dc32a024773968cb1ae00729758e61b7418564a

I'll see whether anything else uses numbers rather than AFNUM_ values.
tcpdump-workers mailing list -- tcpdump-workers@lists.tcpdump.org
To unsubscribe send an email to tcpdump-workers-le...@lists.tcpdump.org

Reply via email to