On Feb 20, 2023, at 2:20 AM, Guy Harris <[email protected]> wrote: > So the code is correct, but could easily be misintrpreted. Perhaps it'd be > better if we used the values from af.h rather than using AF_INET and > AF_INET6.
Done in 0dc32a024773968cb1ae00729758e61b7418564a I'll see whether anything else uses numbers rather than AFNUM_ values. _______________________________________________ tcpdump-workers mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] %(web_page_url)slistinfo%(cgiext)s/%(_internal_name)s
