marcelo bagnulo braun wrote this message on Fri, Aug 01, 2014 at 17:24 +0200:
> El 01/08/14 14:17, ianG escribió: Marcelo wrote:
> >>As we discussed in the meeting, we should try to make some design
> >>decisions for TCPINC.
> >>One of them is whether to protect or not the TCP header.
> >
> >is clearly, not to decide. The charter should leave the level of TCP
> >header protection open. May the best proposal win.
>
> No.
> We are chartered to define one and only one standard for this.
> We would be doing a poor service to the community if we can decide and
> leave someone else the burden to figure out which is the approach to use.
> So the tcpinc wg should define one specification for this, not many.
Except that some people have already gone through the "burden" of
figuring it out...
And letting the proposals decide isn't defining many specifications,
since what ever proposal the wg accepts will be the one specification...
--
John-Mark Gurney Voice: +1 415 225 5579
"All that I will do, has been done, All that I have, has not."
_______________________________________________
Tcpinc mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpinc
