On 1/08/2014 16:24 pm, marcelo bagnulo braun wrote: > El 01/08/14 14:17, ianG escribió: Marcelo wrote: >>> As we discussed in the meeting, we should try to make some design >>> decisions for TCPINC. >>> One of them is whether to protect or not the TCP header. >> >> is clearly, not to decide. The charter should leave the level of TCP >> header protection open. May the best proposal win. >> > > No. > We are chartered to define one and only one standard for this. > We would be doing a poor service to the community if we can decide and > leave someone else the burden to figure out which is the approach to use. > So the tcpinc wg should define one specification for this, not many.
I agree. May the best proposal win: choose the one that best serves the overall needs of competing proposals. It's already clear from the proposals that there will be differing approaches and capabilities. Set a deadline, pick one. iang _______________________________________________ Tcpinc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpinc
