El 01/08/14 21:07, ianG escribió:
On 1/08/2014 16:24 pm, marcelo bagnulo braun wrote:
El 01/08/14 14:17, ianG escribió: Marcelo wrote:
As we discussed in the meeting, we should try to make some design
decisions for TCPINC.
One of them is whether to protect or not the TCP header.
is clearly, not to decide. The charter should leave the level of TCP
header protection open. May the best proposal win.
No.
We are chartered to define one and only one standard for this.
We would be doing a poor service to the community if we can decide and
leave someone else the burden to figure out which is the approach to use.
So the tcpinc wg should define one specification for this, not many.
I agree. May the best proposal win: choose the one that best serves
the overall needs of competing proposals.
It's already clear from the proposals that there will be differing
approaches and capabilities. Set a deadline, pick one.
Right, this is the plan.
The deadline we are aiming for to pick a proposal is november
Regards, marcelo
iang
_______________________________________________
Tcpinc mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpinc
_______________________________________________
Tcpinc mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpinc
