On 7/17/2015 1:34 AM, Stephen Farrell wrote: ... > I think asking the AD to pick is more sensible in cases like > this since regardless of which *starting point* is adopted, the > WG will get to change that however they like before the process > is done. ...
Anyone who has looked at buying an old home knows about "remuddling" (remodeling gone wrong), where every individual change made sense in its context but the result is an incomprehensible and unusable mess. > I also don't see any need > for RFC3929 stuff here, nor do I think that is suited for cases > like this at all. Hmm. I'd like to understand why you think it isn't suited for EXACTLY this case. > IMO Martin can decide based on his take on > the reasonable set of technical arguments already made, none of > which are really "winning." RFC3929 is quite illuminating in NOT offering "AD selects" as an option. I would note that RFC3929 seems to imply that a decision must be made. I consider this WG yet another exercise in politics over content, and the fact that it's failing a strong signal that a decision should not be pushed by the IESG. Joe _______________________________________________ Tcpinc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpinc
