On 17/07/15 18:31, Joe Touch wrote: > > I see your point, but would include other context in comparing the two > approaches - e.g., based on well-established mechanisms vs. not, not > implemented but relatively clean interaction with TCP vs. not, which > puts them on a much more equal footing (which is part of why the WG has > not converged).
Yep, that's fair, I wasn't trying to include all context and the above points are clearly why deciding has been hard. My point though against option 1 is that deciding won't get easier in 4 months. S. _______________________________________________ Tcpinc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpinc
