On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 7:29 AM, Ilari Liusvaara <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 07:22:23AM -0700, Watson Ladd wrote: >> On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 6:33 AM, David Mazieres >> >> This is a misreading: I'm proposing that at any time there is only one >> suite that everyone uses, and versioning is just for transitions. > > This becomes highly problematic when one needs to: > - Support multiple security levels. > - There isn't one technically (meaning, ignore legal constraints) > superrior algorithm.
In case of point 2, why is there a need to use multiple algorithms? As far as point 1 goes, if you want data to only travel over one security level, you cannot support two security levels. > > > -Ilari -- "Man is born free, but everywhere he is in chains". --Rousseau. _______________________________________________ Tcpinc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpinc
