Watson,
On 8/24/15 4:37 PM, Watson Ladd wrote:
On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 1:08 PM, Stephen Kent <[email protected]> wrote:
Watson,
based on many years of experience dealin wit this sort of issue
I suggest that the relative merits (strength, etc.) of cipher suites
form a lattice, not a total order.
Every lattice has a compatible total order
more properly, a total order can be _imposed_ on a lattice.
, and preferences are
expressed as total orders.
The issue here is that reasonable people can disagree about
the total order imposed on the lattice.
Could you explain how your supposed insight
"supposed insight" seems rather pejorative; better watch out for the
IETF mail list PC police
into the reality of comparing ciphersuites justifies exposing all
possible ciphersuites, and permitting specifying arbitrary preferences
among them?
The preferences of others are "arbitrary" but yours are not?
Steve
_______________________________________________
Tcpinc mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpinc
