I recall that some of my profs back at Bucknell were pleased when I was late or absent.  At times I was asked to reduce my questions and give
others a chance.  After a few class sessions of quiet I started again until asked again to shut up. I placed no more value on school policies then than I do now.
I learned that they were there for the school not the participants. 

On a visit a few years after graduation.  One of my profs said that they weren't ready for my kind when I was there....   Still no refund :-)

I avoid the use of texts, lectures and points systems.  It is a fiction to suggest that you can usefully measure participation in a teacher/preacher
lecture hall of 40  or 60 students.   Using small groups you don't have to measure  it.  I would also eliminate grades if I could.  A school without
grades is like a community without racism.  I have students submit learning statements.... that determine their grades.....  you have shown the school
the money ...     now show yourself and me the learning.

Rewards are varied.  I have found that applause from classmates is more powerful than points and easier to calculate :-)

I find some policies curious even darkly amusing.  A student with a attendance record poor enough to be penalized earns a C or  B
has their grade reduced as a penalty.   The students learning stays the same.  If attendance was a factor the learning would have been a B or A..... they
have already been penalized...  



Over the last decade these classroom management issues have become hardy perennials on the list.  The dominant response is punishment, justified by
"the students made me do it"  punishment -r is defined as an s that increases the response it follows when removed.  I guess that 's why these issues are perennials.
Nearly all of the analysis of these issues which appear to be social is non sociological.  Surprising?

IMHO some things to consider as far as learning is concerned
1. No mater what we call them most students are teens...... with teen body clocks set at teen standard time.
2. No mater what our position on the mater customer service is real  and has consequences.
3.  Most teacher/preacher approaches are mechanical and based on adoptive learning of crisp content..... when we are preparing students
     to solve problems and perform tasks that  may not exist until after their graduation.  Many of the curiculla I have seen are so mechanical
     that they resemble Rube Goldberg contraptions.  The brain is organic...... learning is organic....
4. Size matters.  The teacher/preacher approach in a class > 25 has a whole uncharted set of learning consequences.
5. The most used forms of learning are passive and weak compared to unintended  or feral learning.  For example, Seligman found that 30%
of the untrained dogs had learned helplessness.
6. We use instructional materials that are for the most part untested on teen populations.  Has pedagogy been tested on this teen population?
7. Limited discussion of the one suggestion of taking the role of the other (Moms in class).

There is more.

You can see I haven't changed from my Bucknell days, still asking lots of stupid questions.

Del




Kathleen McKinney wrote:
We basically have two "policies" related to attendance...the first, in the student handbook, is a statement simply that students are expected to attend class. The second, in faculty policy is a statement about how faculty must give reasonable accommodation to students missing class for legitimate university business and religious holidays (actually, it might be two separate statements).
k
At 07:49 AM 2/2/2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 First, let me say that this whole discussion of student attendance is extremely interesting and helpful. 
 
I was wondering if all schools or some schools have an attendance policy, if yes, then how profs deal with this, if no, then do profs make such individual policies/decisions?  e.g.: Jay, does your school have an attendance policy? 
 
Thanks,
Anna Karpathakis
Kingsborough C.C., CUNY
 
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Teaching Sociology <[email protected]>
Sent: Thu, 02 Feb 2006 05:38:32 -0800
Subject: TEACHSOC: Re: 8:00 Classes



I frame attendance, lateness, and participation as matters of learning
and courtesy.  I do not think of them in terms of training for future
jobs.  If a student can learn everything in the course without ever
coming to class, aces the paper and exams, the student gets an A.  I
think that as a matter of courtesy, students have obligations to the
course as they would to other interactions -- to be present, to listen
and respond, etc.  But I think grades should be about intellectual
performance, so I'm reluctant to use academic sanctions (grades) to
enforce social norms.

Using absences to knock down students' grades also puts the professor
into the position of making moral distinctions among reasons for
absence or lateness, an exercise I prefer to avoid especially since the
policy gives rise to questions of honesty and verification.  I don't
want to see notes from the doctor about their physical ailments or
notes from the undertaker about their grandmother's funeral or notes
from the mechanic about their wheel bearings.

I am also baffled as to how one might quantify these more social
aspects of the course.  Students have told me of courses where the
professor says something like, "Participation counts for 15% of your
grade," and I always wonder how professors decides how many points to
award for this or that student comment.   Do they go back to their
offices immediately after class and score each student comment as they
remember it?  Or do they, at the end of the semester, give a number
based on their overall impression?

However, like Marty, I will use attendance and participation when
scores on exams and papers puts a student's final grade on the cusp.

Jay Livingston
Montclair State College

Kathleen McKinney
Cross Endowed Chair in the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning
Professor, Sociology
Carnegie Scholar
Box 6370
Illinois State University
Normal, Il 61790-6370
off 309-438-7706
fax 309-438-8788
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.ilstu.edu/~kmckinne/

Reply via email to