|
John Glass asked whether students
understand journal articles, a legitimate concern. Below I’ve
pasted an assignment I use, adapted from materials passed on to me when I was a
grad student at I do a similar assignment in most classes,
tailoring the specific journal list to the class. I spend at least two
class days discussing ‘the literature’ and walking through student
responses to the assignment with them after small group discussions and
comparisons of what they’ve found. The assignment is a useful one
very early in the semester and is usually followed by literature review assignments
requiring use of the journals. Susan Webb President, National
Council of State Sociological Associations and Professor of Sociology (843) 349-2933 SAMPLE
ASSIGNMENT: Sociology
305: Sociology of the Family Research
Summary and Critique Assignment Due Tuesday, February 1, 2005
40 points The objectives of this assignment are to familiarize you with scholarly
research in the sociology of the family, to engage you in examining analytical
and empirical questions, to involve you in applying theoretical and research
terminology in literature reviews, and to encourage you to clearly assess
research reports. Select and read a research article (i.e. an article that states
a research question, uses specific research methods, sampling and data
techniques, and reports research findings), published on or after January 1,
1995, in one of the following journals: American
Journal of Sociology Do not use the same article American
Sociological Review a classmate or friend has read. Journal
of Marriage and the Family Rural
Sociology Social
Forces DO NOT RESHELVE JOURNALS – put
them on carts provided in the library. Check with a reference librarian
if you cannot find the journal you want. The article must relate to a subject in the Sociology of the Family --
use the Subject Index beginning on page 533 of the text as a guide. If
you search for a specific article using online sources, use a concept from the
subject index as a keyword included in the abstract. If online,
use full text articles only (some/all of these journals are available in
InfoTrac OneFile, Expanded Academic Index, JSTOR). If you use print
sources, you can browse through volumes and issues of the journal you select to
locate articles related to text subjects. READ THE ENTIRE ARTICLE; COPY OR PRINT OUT THE FIRST PAGE TO TURN IN
WITH THE ASSIGNMENT. Summarize and critique the article in a paper of 500 (2 pages, minimum)
to 1250 (5 pages, maximum) words, typed, double-spaced. Do a cover page
(staple, upper left corner)with the title: Summary and Critique of [A full citation of the
article]
(Author(s), Year, Article title, Journal name, Volume number, Issue
number, Page numbers) Your name The course The university And the date Attach a copy (or printout) of the first page of the article to
the back of your summary and critique. The paper must
summarize and evaluate the research article. The summary must be more
extensive than the paper abstract. Use your own words; if you must quote
phrases or sentences from the article use APA or ASA citations with page
number. Cover the following four areas: 1. Thesis: Clearly state the main points,
concepts, and theoretical bases of the article. Summarize these in
your own words as much as possible; if you use words from the article, provide
citations. 2. Methods: What methods did the author use to
investigate the topic? In other words, how did the author go about
supporting the thesis? Summarize the independent and dependent variables,
research methods and design, sampling, and analysis techniques used. Were
the variables, methods, sampling, and analysis appropriate and effective? 3. Evidence: What were the findings of the
study? What evidence did the author use? How well did the evidence
support the thesis? 4. Evaluation:
What are the
strengths and weaknesses of the article? Who would benefit from reading
the article, and how would the research be of help to them? What is your
evaluation of the article? What suggestions do you have for repeating
this study or one like it? The following questions can guide you in your reading and analysis of
the article: SUMMARY The Research Problem: What general questions(s) is/are addressed?
What is the overall purpose of the research? The Literature Review: How does the study relate to other theories and
research findings? The Theoretical Framework: What concepts and theories guide the
research? How are concepts defined? Hypotheses: What specific question(s) is/are the author(s)
attempting to answer? Research Design: Stated generally, how were the data gathered
(questionnaires, interviews, observations, experiment, secondary analysis,
etc.)? What independent, dependent, control and/or other variables were
used? Sample: To what general population does the research
pertain? Who (what) were the objects of study? How was the sample
selected? Procedure: Specifically, how were the data gathered and
analyzed? Describe briefly what was done in the study. What
statistical or other procedures were used to analyze the data? Observations: What were the results of the study? Conclusions: Were the hypotheses accepted, rejected, or
modified? Was the purpose of the investigation fulfilled? CRITIQUE General: Does the paper contribute substantially to
knowledge? Are there errors of logic or unstated assumptions and
values? Is the writing clear and precise (remember the journal readers
are professionals in the field)? What are the overall strengths and weaknesses
of the report? The Research Problem: Is the problem stated fully and clearly? Is there
adequate justification for doing the research? Are the objectives of the
research clear and convincing? The Literature Review: How adequate is the literature review? Does the review
accurately relate to the research problem? Is there literature which should
have been included but was not? The Theoretical Framework: Are the concepts of the study clearly and
fully defined? Are the relationships between the concepts logically and effectively
stated? Is the author's thinking clear and acceptable? Hypotheses: Are the hypotheses: clearly stated? free of
subjective content? testable? relevant to the literature, theory, concepts? Are
alternative hypotheses discussed? Could the hypotheses be improved? How? Research Design: Is the design appropriate for the theory and
concepts? Is the sample representative of the population? Will the variables
provide the proper data to test the hypotheses? Are the variables reliable,
valid measures of the concepts? Does the author explain how potentially
disruptive factors and extraneous variables will be eliminated or controlled?
Do the techniques used seem appropriate and acceptable? Does it appear the
study was thoroughly planned prior to the collection of data? Could the
research design be improved? How? Data and Analysis: Does the author specify where, when, how and by whom
the data was collected? Could the data collection have been improved? Is
the method of data analysis clearly explained? Is the data analysis method
adequate? To what extent are the hypotheses supported or refuted? Conclusions and Discussion: Does the author express reasonable
caution before accepting the data as supporting the hypotheses? If the
hypotheses are not fully supported, are efforts made to explain the deviation
from expected results? Are the author's claims for the findings consistent with
the data? Is the evidence presented in the article sufficient for the author's
conclusions? To what extent did the author accomplish the purposes of the
study? How might the author's conclusions and discussion be improved? --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Teaching Sociology" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/teachsoc -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~--- |
- TEACHSOC: Re: List of Sociology Journals D. Angus Vail
- TEACHSOC: Re: List of Sociology Journals Kathleen McKinney
- TEACHSOC: Re: List of Sociology Journals Vivian Varela-TC
- TEACHSOC: Re: List of Sociology Journals Tina Deshotels
- TEACHSOC: Re: List of Sociology Journals Michael Johnston
- TEACHSOC: Representing sociology Anne Eisenberg
- TEACHSOC: List of Sociology Journals John Glass
- TEACHSOC: Re: List of Sociology Journals Michael DeCesare
- TEACHSOC: Re: List of Sociology Journals Kathleen McKinney
- TEACHSOC: Re: List of Sociology Journa... Michael Johnston
- TEACHSOC: Teaching Sociology Journals Susan Webb
- TEACHSOC: Re: Teaching Sociology Journals Elizabeth Durden
- TEACHSOC: Re: Teaching Sociology Journals Robert Hironimus-Wendt
- TEACHSOC: about low grades Jack Estes
- TEACHSOC: Re: about low grades Susan Boser
- TEACHSOC: Re: about low grades Robert Hironimus-Wendt
- TEACHSOC: Re: List of Sociology Journals bc_kitty
- TEACHSOC: Re: List of Sociology Journals Del Thomas Ph D
- TEACHSOC: List of Sociology Journals Kathy Liddle
