All, Happy Mothers Day to all us Moms....as it is Mothers Day and my 18th wedding anniversary, I will keep this response short. As I noted in my earlier message and Mike notes again below, these are all empirical SoTL questions about learning on which we need research--both the claims some of us made and the things of which Mike is no convinced (below). That said, I do believe reading sociological journal articles is useful. Though my data is not yet systematic, my informal observations, student reflection, etc. indicate that reading articles can help students understand soc perspectives, see the application of our discipline, better understand one way we "do" and represent sociology, get a sense of the diversity of our field and approaches, see the passion many researchers have for an issue or area, and so on. Is it the only way we socialize students to the discipline? Gosh, I hope not. It is only one way and would get at only some aspects of what we want to socialize our student to... And, clearly, your learning objectives, background of students, choice of articles, scaffolding provided to help students with the articles...are all critical. To be honest, it seems to me that if we think so little of the value of the journal articles in soc, of the educational functions they might serve, of our instructional abilities to use them well if we take the time and do the SoTL or classroom assessmen work, and of our students' abilities to learn from them, and so on...we may be in serious trouble!
Michael DeCesare wrote: > Thanks to everyone who responded to my questions. I want to make a few > points of clarification. > > I probably should've mentioned that the readers I put together for my > courses include both journal articles and book chapters. So it's not > that I don't use articles from sociological journals--it's that I'm > finding it more and more difficult to justify making students plod > through them, as I said in my original post. > > Second, I fully realize, as Kathleen pointed out, that not all > articles are empirical and that not all empirical articles are > quantitative. My intention wasn't to debate the merits of quantitative > versus qualitative approaches. Regardless of whether an article is > empirical, or primarily quantitative or qualitative, my question was > only whether there were really that many articles out there that folks > thought important enough to expose our students to. > > Frankly, I'm not at all convinced by many of the responses that people > offered, namely: that reading journal articles helps students > understand the "systematic application of sociological concepts, > theories, issues, and concerns"; that scholarly journal articles are > the major way--or even one major way--of making our research public; > that we should hold up our journal articles as a model for how > students' own papers should be written and organized; that we should > use articles to help students learn to deal with the frustration of > understanding only pieces of what they read; or that the struggle to > understand journal articles can be a useful experience. > > I think what I'm least convinced by, though, is the argument that > making students read journal articles will help socialize them into > the discipline. Should this even be our goal at the undergraduate > level--to socialize students into sociology as a discipline? Or should > it be to help them understand what the sociological perspective > offers? I think there's a huge difference between the two approaches. > "Forcing" students to read and think about the issues raised in a > journal article, in my opinion, is very different from socializing > them into the discipline. Are we teaching/training undergraduates or > graduate students? I think our content and objectives depend upon our > answers to that question. Most of my students, for instance, can't > tell me what sociology is or how it differs from the other social > sciences. And these are junior and senior sociology majors. Are > journal articles really going to help them clarify things? I don't > believe they will. > > From my perspective, all of the issues that I and others have raised > are empirical issues--empirical issues that haven't really been > addressed, let alone resolved, by sociologists who study teaching. > Michael mentioned, for instance, that his students "learned quite a > bit" and "learned tremendously." I'm not doubting that they did; I'm > just wondering how we're measuring learning and whether we can be so > sure of ourselves. Shouldn't we start to empirically examine some of > the positions that we've taken for granted for so long--like that > struggling through a scholarly article is a meaningful learning > experience, for example? > > All of this notwithstanding, thanks again, folks. As always, your > comments have been helpful as I continue to rethink and clarify my own > positions on the teaching of our discipline. > > Best, > Mike > > *********************** > Michael DeCesare > California State University, Northridge > Department of Sociology > 336 Santa Susana Hall > 18111 Nordhoff Street > Northridge, CA 91330-8318 > 818.677.7198 > 818.677.2059 (Fax) > [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > http://www.csun.edu/~mdecesare <http://www.csun.edu/%7Emdecesare> > > ----- Original Message ----- > *From:* Michael DeCesare <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > *To:* [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > *Sent:* Thursday, May 11, 2006 8:46 AM > *Subject:* Re: TEACHSOC: List of Sociology Journals > > Hi everyone, > > I think John raises some valid and interesting issues. Among other > things, he asked about the proportion of articles we can expect > students to understand. I'd like to add another, related question: > Is it important for students to even read the articles that appear > in our journals? > > It seems to me that there's a reasonable case to be made that much > of the work that's published in our journals--and not just the > top-tier ones--is not only incomprehensible to people who aren't > thoroughly trained in statistics, as John pointed out, but is also > perceived to be trivial and/or irrelevant to lots of sociologists. > So why is it important for our undergraduates to read the latest > ASR, AJS, or Social Forces articles--especially when not many of > us even read them? > > I ask because aside from using them to teach students the > differences between scholarly and non-scholarly work, it's > increasingly difficult for me to justify requiring students to > read the latest and greatest articles from our discipline's journals. > > Stirring the pot, > Mike! > > ****************************** > Michael DeCesare > California State University, Northridge > Department of Sociology > 336 Santa Susana Hall > 18111 Nordhoff Street > Northridge, CA 91330-8318 > 818.677.7198 > 818.677.2059 (Fax) > [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > http://www.csun.edu/~mdecesare <http://www.csun.edu/%7Emdecesare> > > ----- Original Message ----- > *From:* John Glass <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > *To:* [email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]> > *Sent:* Thursday, May 11, 2006 8:26 AM > *Subject:* TEACHSOC: List of Sociology Journals > > just curious...has anyone ever asked students about whether or > not they understand journal articles? i think it is an > unwarranted assumption that directing students to journals is > going to assist them in learning material within our > discipline. let's face it, how many of the articles can we > expect undergraduates to understand given the increasing > complexity of statistical analyses? how many do WE understand? > and we expect students to use current research to write term > papers? > > i have asked students to pick a journal article, read it, rate > their level of undertanding (likert scale of 1 - 5) and then > discuss what they DID understand and what they DIDN'T > understand. it was an interesting assignment...for me. has > made me reconsider things like "research" papers. > > something to think about? > > john > > John E. Glass, Ph.D. > Professor of Sociology > Division of Social & Behavioral Sciences > Colin County Community College > Preston Ridge Campus > 9700 Wade Boulevard > Frisco, TX 75035 > +1-972-377-1622 > http://iws.ccccd.edu/jglass/ > [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > "We are more concerned about the discovery of knowledge than > with its dissemination" > B. F. Skinner > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Teaching Sociology" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/teachsoc -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
