Christos Zoulas <[email protected]> wrote: > On large filesystems with many files fsck can take a really long time after > a crash. In my personal experience power outages are much less frequent than > crashes (I crash quite a lot since I always fiddle with things). If you > don't care about fsck time, you don't need WAPBL.
But you just told me that I will need a fsck after crash now I am running with vfs.wapbl.flush_disk_cache=0 so I wonder if I should not just mount without -o log. What are WAPBL benefits when running with vfs.wapbl.flush_disk_cache=0? -- Emmanuel Dreyfus http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz [email protected]
