On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 03:34:19AM +0200, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote: > Christos Zoulas <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On large filesystems with many files fsck can take a really long time after > > a crash. In my personal experience power outages are much less frequent than > > crashes (I crash quite a lot since I always fiddle with things). If you > > don't care about fsck time, you don't need WAPBL. > > But you just told me that I will need a fsck after crash now I am > running with vfs.wapbl.flush_disk_cache=0 so I wonder if I should not > just mount without -o log. What are WAPBL benefits when running with > vfs.wapbl.flush_disk_cache=0?
For a NFS server, I'm not sure there's any benefit ... -- Manuel Bouyer <[email protected]> NetBSD: 26 ans d'experience feront toujours la difference --
