David Holland <[email protected]> wrote: > The downside is that without the cache flushing there's some chance > that fsck won't be able to repair things afterwards.
This is scary. If this is a WAPBL/NFS/RAIDframe interaction, I think I'd rather dump the RAID than the insurence to have a working fsck after a crash. -- Emmanuel Dreyfus http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz [email protected]
