Christos Zoulas writes: > > Hi, > > I noticed that gets_s (a bounded version of gets) was added in the kernel. > While this iis nice, it conflicts with the c-11 "Annex K" which has a > different prototype (takes rsize_t instead of size_t). Perhaps we should > rename this to kgets() or getl() now before it causes problems. > > Opinions?
sounds like a good idea to me. i like kgets() over getl(). .mrg.
