On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 12:36:54PM +0200, Maxime Villard wrote: > >I noticed that gets_s (a bounded version of gets) was added in the kernel. > >While this iis nice, it conflicts with the c-11 "Annex K" which has a > >different prototype (takes rsize_t instead of size_t). Perhaps we should > >rename this to kgets() or getl() now before it causes problems. > > This is not in the kernel, this is in the bootloader. So you can > forget kgets. I don't think we need to rename it; it remains close > to what some people may be used to seeing, and does differ that > much.
How about not giving people the false impression it's part of Annex K? > gets is not gets either, and so far nobody has complained about it. Er, it was when I looked at it... or close enough -- David A. Holland [email protected]
