On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 12:04:26PM -0400, Christos Zoulas wrote: > | How about not giving people the false impression it's part of Annex K? > | > | > gets is not gets either, and so far nobody has complained about it. > > Yes, that was my point. I also wanted to remove gets() in SA completely. > > | Er, it was when I looked at it... or close enough > > It has tty display handling...
Given that it's libsa and there are no ttys, that seems "close enough". anyway, we should get rid of that gets, that's why I filed a PR on it when I discovered it existing. -- David A. Holland [email protected]
