At Wed, 01 Jun 2016 08:09:01 +0200, Joachim Strömbergson wrote: > > I actually wrote about it both in the commit message and in the README.
So you did. 0.81 => 1.00 would not have puzzled me, nor would 0.81 => 1.81. It was 0.81 => 1.80 that seemed a bit odd. But, whatever. > I bumped the major number since the new functionality changed the > behaviour of the API in a non-ignorable way. From other open projects, > these types of changes means an increase in major number as far as I > understand it. Entirely reasonable. _______________________________________________ Tech mailing list Tech@cryptech.is https://lists.cryptech.is/listinfo/tech
