-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Aloha!

Rob Austein wrote:
> At Wed, 01 Jun 2016 08:09:01 +0200, Joachim Strömbergson wrote:
>> I actually wrote about it both in the commit message and in the
>> README.
> 
> So you did.  0.81 => 1.00 would not have puzzled me, nor would 0.81
> => 1.81.  It was 0.81 => 1.80 that seemed a bit odd.  But, whatever.

Ah, that was not intentional. I can fully understand the confusion. 1.81
was the intention. Sorry.

- -- 
Med vänlig hälsning, Yours

Joachim Strömbergson - Alltid i harmonisk svängning.
========================================================================
 Joachim Strömbergson          Secworks AB          joac...@secworks.se
========================================================================
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
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=75rp
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Tech mailing list
Tech@cryptech.is
https://lists.cryptech.is/listinfo/tech

Reply via email to