----- Original Message -----
From: "Mr.Bad" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, May 11, 2001 3:38 PM
Subject: Re: [freenet-tech] Ideas for a FreeNet Process


> >>>>> "SR" == Stefan Reich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>     SR> The point is... if you execute code on a Freenet node you got
>     SR> from someplace you-don't-know-where, it can do all kinds of
>     SR> weird things to your system.  All I can say is that I wouldn't
>     SR> want to do that to my system.
>
> Well, I think the obviously right thing to do there would be to make
> some kind of sandbox, a la SecurityManager (in Java), or Safe:: in
> Perl, or whatever the equivalent is in Python. Not that any sandbox is
> ever 100% safe, but it's a lot better than having some code to "rm -Rf
> /" your system.
>
> It also seems like the application of this concept (distributed
> processing) would be good for things like Seti@Home or RC5 cracking,
> but bad for things like running a Web server. One suggested idea --
> distributed key verification, or distributed indexing -- would be
> really useful for Freenet.
>
> Anyways, this whole thing seems like a good application of Freenet,
> but not a good part of the Freenet node code.

Hmmm I could begin design of a freenet app that could securely distribute a
process amonst app nodes.
But the key here is to make freenet as powerful and impenatrable as
possible.  And for this, the node protocol would be the safest route.

But certainly I could attempt to prove concept with a free net app to
distribute a process securely and anonymously.

thx for the input
HackerKungFu

>
> ~Mr. Bad
>
> --
>  ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>  Mr. Bad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Pigdog Journal | http://pigdog.org/
>  freenet:MSK@SSK@u1AntQcZ81Y4c2tJKd1M87cZvPoQAge/pigdog+journal//
>  "Statements like this give the impression that this article was
>   written by a madman in a drug induced rage"  -- Ben Franklin
>  ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
> _______________________________________________
> freenet-tech mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/tech
>

_______________________________________________
freenet-tech mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/tech

Reply via email to