Interesting. I'm not entirely sure what these graphs tell us though, as explained earlier ...
It is very surprising that slow nodes don't drag down the whole network; throttling without backoff seems competitive with, if not better than, throttling with backoff, even on a heterogenous network. Ideas? Explanations? On Fri, Dec 01, 2006 at 05:41:52PM +0100, Jano wrote: > Jano wrote: > > > Michael Rogers wrote: > > > >> Jano wrote: > >>> Is this in svn? *cue Rogers* > >> > >> Revision 11135. *Exits stage left* > > > > Uck, I thought the changes would be outside of phase7. Now I don't know > > what revision used for my tests. Re-running them... > > Now with slow nodes, 2 .. 28 step 2. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/tech/attachments/20061201/16cdb8db/attachment.pgp>
