* Jusa Saari <jargonautti at hotmail.com> [2006-05-09 00:24:25]:

> On Mon, 08 May 2006 21:26:54 +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> 
> > I think Freemail is quite an important app. I think it would be very
> > useful from a political standpoint (it tops Guerra's wishlist), from a
> > self hosting development standpoint (the rest is easy once we have email),
> > and for various other reasons.
> > 
> > Should it be in the top 4 SoC apps? If not, can you give me a specific
> > reason why not? I admit that its implementation in the current system will
> > be a bit ugly, but I'm not sure this is a serious problem *as long as
> > routing works*. 0.8 might introduce server messaging and so on, but IMHO
> > we should use the storage layer as much as possible; this is why I want to
> > use passive requests to implement pub/sub. Anything that relies on a
> > server being up right at the instant of the message being sent is
> > susceptible to intersection attacks; we should play to our strengths,
> > namely non-real-time communication. (I insert ... you request).
> 
> Why won't you simply use Frost ? Just make a channel to serve as your
> inbox, and request that people encrypt their mail with your public key
> (which Frost already supports). Channelname collisions won't be a problem
> either, since Frost uses SSK keys for them. Besides, nearly every Freenet
> user is likely to have Frost, since it is one of the few programs that
> actually do anything usefull there (no, browsing Freeweb is not usefull at
> current speeds and bitrot rate, or at least wasn't the last time I tried
> it).
> 
> Or, if you want to use an email program for communication, add POP
> protocol to Frost. It is open source, after all.

NNTP you mean ?

NextGen$

> 
> Or have a look at FMB. That, too, offers e-mail like functionality over
> Freenet.
> 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: 
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/tech/attachments/20060508/cbac1763/attachment.pgp>

Reply via email to