On Friday 03 October 2008 17:27, Michael Rogers wrote: > Can't remember whether this has been raised before, but a random walk > terminates at a given node with probability proportional to the node's > degree; does this mean high-degree nodes are more likely to receive swap > requests than low-degree nodes? Seems like that could be disruptive in > two ways: > > 1) When a high-degree node changes its location, many other nodes are > affected. > > 2) There might be some correlation between degree and other properties: > high-degree darknet nodes might belong to committed users with large > stores, in which case it's particularly disruptive if those nodes keep > moving. > > Just a thought.
I don't know. This looks like a question for vive/oskar. > > Cheers, > Michael -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 827 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/tech/attachments/20081003/3a3ce67a/attachment.pgp>
