2008/10/4 Matthew Toseland <toad at amphibian.dyndns.org>: > On Friday 03 October 2008 17:27, Michael Rogers wrote: >> Can't remember whether this has been raised before, but a random walk >> terminates at a given node with probability proportional to the node's >> degree; does this mean high-degree nodes are more likely to receive swap >> requests than low-degree nodes? Seems like that could be disruptive in >> two ways: >> >> 1) When a high-degree node changes its location, many other nodes are >> affected.
If you/vive/oskar are looking at the the degree thing... please review this as well: http://code.bulix.org/20bjpk-68537 This patch remove the opennet location from swapping -- essentially seperating the darknet and openet. >> 2) There might be some correlation between degree and other properties: >> high-degree darknet nodes might belong to committed users with large >> stores, in which case it's particularly disruptive if those nodes keep >> moving. >> >> Just a thought. > > I don't know. This looks like a question for vive/oskar. >> >> Cheers, >> Michael > > _______________________________________________ > Tech mailing list > Tech at freenetproject.org > http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tech >
