On Tue, 20 Apr 2010, Andrew Prowant wrote: > On Tue, 20 Apr 2010 12:39:41 -0500 (CDT), Matt Lawrence > <[email protected]> wrote: >> Having a linux server with an uptime of 1188 days is pretty neat from a >> geeky perspective. Having a production server on the network of a > company >> that handles billions of dollars in financial transaction that hasn't > had >> security updates in 1188 days is rather frightening. >> > > What are the lists thoughts on using something like KSplice to keep the > kernel up to date?
If I have systems that really need to be up all the time, then it sounds like an excellent product. If I cn afford scheduled downtime, I would prefer to stick with the more traditional method of making updates. -- Matt It's not what I know that counts. It's what I can remember in time to use. _______________________________________________ Tech mailing list [email protected] http://lopsa.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tech This list provided by the League of Professional System Administrators http://lopsa.org/
