> Frankly, having scheme in without any support for REPL in mg is not > that awesome. What makes elisp so handy is an ability to see what > happens in realtime while programming (the usual Lisp/REPL development > way).
pthth. I don't care if elisp is handy. That's not the point. The point is, would one of these things make mg smaller or better. I would *love* to remove all most all of the the mode code, so long as there is something to replace it. > Also, it makes more sense to have a R[456]RS-compliant version than > just any or "tiny". Define sense. > P.S. > mg is buggy and its source code is awful. And your mama is ugly. I said so, so it must be true. Seriously, if you find bug, *report them*. They get fixed, but usually only if I know of their existence. The source code is fine. -kj
