On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 17:53 -0700, [email protected] wrote: > > Also, it makes more sense to have a R[456]RS-compliant version than > > just any or "tiny". > > Define sense. >
so that you know what this implementation supports and you don't have to look into its source code to figure that out. come on, we even have a standart for C! > > P.S. > > mg is buggy and its source code is awful. > > And your mama is ugly. I said so, so it must be true. > > Seriously, if you find bug, *report them*. They get fixed, but usually > only if I know of their existence. > > The source code is fine. > i didn't want to insult you, especially as i know how much effort you've put into it, nevertheless, i can't call it fine since even string/buffer/line abstractions do not work. quick example: M-x replace-string hold 'a' key and see what happens. and i've encountered much more wierd problems that i can't sit down and fix in one evening. and i'm talking about veread and complt here. they don't do proper size checking somewhere. > -kj
