> Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 15:46:03 +0300 > From: Mike Belopuhov <[email protected]> > > On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 17:53 -0700, [email protected] wrote: > > > Also, it makes more sense to have a R[456]RS-compliant version than > > > just any or "tiny". > > > > Define sense. > > > > so that you know what this implementation supports and > you don't have to look into its source code to figure > that out. come on, we even have a standart for C!
Which probably nobody implements completely either.
