On Sat, Jan 07, 2012 at 11:47:32PM +0100, Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado wrote: > On Fri, 06 Jan 2012 23:51:28 +0100, Ariane van der Steldt > <ari...@stack.nl> wrote: > > I found and fixed the i386 bug. Please test this, to confirm that it > > fixes the problem (and doesn't introduce anything else, ofcourse). > > (vmmap_sys relative to /usr/src/sys, vmmap_userland relative to /usr/src) > > > > New version of the diff: > > http://www.stack.nl/~ariane/vmmap_sys.diff.64 > > with corresponding userland: > > http://www.stack.nl/~ariane/vmmap_userland.diff.30 > > (the userland portion is unchanged). > > > > SHA256 (vmmap_sys.diff.64) = > > aa87c7a6d1c485b6acb228f238a54bee8c28eb5cc6cfc65da6e6b3b047d94e93 > > MD5 (vmmap_sys.diff.64) = 2d7587702ce2bf7ce50bf58c5b24a6cc > > vmmap_sys.diff.64 size: 305807 bytes > > > > SHA256 (vmmap_userland.diff.30) = > > 85d2cb4d85a6a9cffd16940f17498321243ef9731a687161b3b38caadaf6dc06 > > MD5 (vmmap_userland.diff.30) = f5add708c2d1f84dc05f2ceb1749c9cf > > vmmap_userland.diff.30 size: 2011
Hmm, did I write 2011 there? That was ofcourse not correct... Must have been confused with the year end or something :P > Your patch fix the bug. I've been using the computer for 3 hours without > apparent problems. Everybody thanks for testing this, it's been a tremendous help to me. As far as I'm concerned, this diff will be commited once we unlock after release (in a coordinated manner ofcourse, since this is uvm we're talking about). It's about time too, ofcourse: 64 revisions of the same diff is alot. :D -- Ariane
