24 P0P?QP5P;Q 2012B P3. 20:05 P?P>P;QP7P>P2P0QP5P;Q Matthew Dempsky
<[email protected]> P=P0P?P8QP0P;:
> On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 4:11 PM, Peter Hessler <[email protected]> wrote:
>> On 2012 Apr 24 (Tue) at 16:27:00 +0400 (+0400), Vadim Zhukov wrote:
>> :This will somewhat break dual-booting machines with Windblows as
>> :second OS. :( But I'm not a developer and do not have any vote, of
>> :course. :)
>
> Ugh. I didn't realize Windows still expects the RTC to be local time by
default.
>
>> Windows 7 does not have that limitation, you can configure it to use UTC
>> as the BIOS clock.
>
> It looks like Markus Kuhn has a FAQ about Windows, the RTC, and UTC:
> http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~mgk25/mswish/ut-rtc.html
>
> TL;DR: Windows Vista SP2 and Windows 7 support setting the RTC to UTC,
> but your system might become unresponsive during DST changes...
> idiots.
>
>
> I'm inclined to say our FAQ
> (http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq8.html#TimeZone) should instruct
> Windows users to just set RealTimeIsUniversal and bring any issues to
> Microsoft to fix rather than working around the issue with kernel
> timezone support. It doesn't make sense for us to continue
> complicating things just to workaround their broken design. Microsoft
> has had 10+ years to make this setting work.

Agree. :) Thanks for all the info and your work!

--
  WBR,
  Vadim Zhukov

Reply via email to