On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 11:43:15AM +0000, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2013/03/21 12:32, Taylan Ulrich B. wrote: > > Stuart Henderson <[email protected]> writes: > > > > > As I said, "perhaps the uthread workarounds that we used to have > > > in the port got committed upstream and now need to be reverted?" > > > > > > .... i.e. _used_ to have, before the change to rthreads. > > > > Oh sorry, I understand now. Indeed, the patches in e.g. 5.0 ports seem > > equivalent to what is now upstream (although not exactly identical). > > > > In your opinion, should upstream Boehm GC try to support pre-rthreads > > OpenBSD versions as well, or drop that and only support rthreads? (Or do > > the new patches work for both?) > > As far as I'm concerned it's not really worth supporting both, but > this depends on their usual policies..
Upstream insisted on supporting both. > > Any way, the new patches will have to be integrated to master. Would > > anyone like to take that job? If not, I'd like to try, although I don't > > know how long it would take for me. > > I don't want that job ;) AFAIK Kurt was talking about this recently and he was working with upstream to have the patches integrated. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
