On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 11:12, Vadim Zhukov wrote: >> If we go back to returning ENOMEM or whatever in sem_init, does that >> fix KDE? > > If we stop pretending we support shared unnamed semaphores, then, yes, > this will help KDE. But I cannot gurantee there will be no other > fallout. This needs a deep scan of all ports source as minimum...
> I'd rather disable shared semaphores totally, until all issues are > fixed, then. I don't see a point in having half-working stuff in tree > which gets picked up and used. Maybe I wasn't clear, that's exactly what I wanted to do. Anyway, I just went ahead and did it. sem_init(pshared) will return EPERM as before.
